New NOE WILL cycle!!!
Posted: 28 Feb 2014 10:48
If I knew how to change the title of my other post I would. I don't want to give the NOE bullet a bad reputation. It should read..."Another one of DON'S stupid mistakes" or "things to watch for when reloading one bullet, for multiple guns".
So I go and check the NOE slug against my old Lyman, cussing under my breath the day I ever tried a new mold. And sure nuff, the NOE was a tad bigger at the meplat. A very little tad mind you, but the nose section from crimp groove to nose was shorter by .030. AH HA!!! well.... wait a minute. I was complaining bout the rounds being too long in the other post(?) So I look through some of my recent loaded ammo and find a 1/3rd box of 100 that I remember shooting without problems, and they were loaded with the new slug. And the loaded OAL was .030 shorter than the old lyman slugged ammo measured. So I loaded up a few in the 92 and sure nuff, they cycled perfectly
Totally confused, I put the two NOE loaded rounds side by side for a comparison and the problem was plainly obvious. While reading about 45Colt revolver accuracy. I had read more than once about neck sizing the brass. (blasted internet). It seems that most mfgs tend to make 45 colt chambers rather large, and ruger followed suit with some of the biggest. So in my search for accuracy, I gave it a try and neck sized the brass at the last loading session. This left most of the brass rather large in the mid section measuring in at .482. Some were smaller and were probably shot out of the R92 which has a more sane sized chamber. I shot both guns on the same day, so the brass was mixed before it was sized.
Now with the fat boy brass, when the round comes up from the magazine on the carrier. Then the bolt shoves it forward. The guides are tight enough (like they should be on a spec sized case) that the fat boy cant squeeze through the gap, and get on top of the guides. Instead, it goes forward just a tad, and jams, looking exactly like the round was too long, and could not make the curves, jumps, jiggles, and ricochets, that get it into the chamber. I can see how this could be a problem with other reloaders, that are new to the quirks of the 92. And maybe got a gun with tight guides. Thou I have not heard of such a thing but instead, have heard the opposite with the guides being loose.
I guess now I have bout 50 "ruger only" (pun) loads I betcha next time, i resize em all the way to the bottom....like I have been doing for the last 39 years!
So I go and check the NOE slug against my old Lyman, cussing under my breath the day I ever tried a new mold. And sure nuff, the NOE was a tad bigger at the meplat. A very little tad mind you, but the nose section from crimp groove to nose was shorter by .030. AH HA!!! well.... wait a minute. I was complaining bout the rounds being too long in the other post(?) So I look through some of my recent loaded ammo and find a 1/3rd box of 100 that I remember shooting without problems, and they were loaded with the new slug. And the loaded OAL was .030 shorter than the old lyman slugged ammo measured. So I loaded up a few in the 92 and sure nuff, they cycled perfectly
Totally confused, I put the two NOE loaded rounds side by side for a comparison and the problem was plainly obvious. While reading about 45Colt revolver accuracy. I had read more than once about neck sizing the brass. (blasted internet). It seems that most mfgs tend to make 45 colt chambers rather large, and ruger followed suit with some of the biggest. So in my search for accuracy, I gave it a try and neck sized the brass at the last loading session. This left most of the brass rather large in the mid section measuring in at .482. Some were smaller and were probably shot out of the R92 which has a more sane sized chamber. I shot both guns on the same day, so the brass was mixed before it was sized.
Now with the fat boy brass, when the round comes up from the magazine on the carrier. Then the bolt shoves it forward. The guides are tight enough (like they should be on a spec sized case) that the fat boy cant squeeze through the gap, and get on top of the guides. Instead, it goes forward just a tad, and jams, looking exactly like the round was too long, and could not make the curves, jumps, jiggles, and ricochets, that get it into the chamber. I can see how this could be a problem with other reloaders, that are new to the quirks of the 92. And maybe got a gun with tight guides. Thou I have not heard of such a thing but instead, have heard the opposite with the guides being loose.
I guess now I have bout 50 "ruger only" (pun) loads I betcha next time, i resize em all the way to the bottom....like I have been doing for the last 39 years!