The Marlin 1895M you sold isn't made anymore either & I don't think it will ever be resurrected as a production rifle by Remlin.Ranch Dog wrote:It is a real shame that the 450 never received the recognition that it deserved. I always felt that the belted rimless case was far superior in feed to the 45-70 in the 1895. That is something that would be very important to me if I was using the cartridge for what it was intended for. I think you made a very good choice in the BLR.pricedo wrote:Looks like Browning discontinued the BLR in 450 Marlin.
I'll hang on to it for a while.
An obsolete gun in an almost obsolete caliber sounds like a great investment.
There is just not enough interest in the 450 Marlin cause the venerable & ubiquitous 45-70 has overlapped & eclipsed it in functionality.
The 450 Marlin BLR I bought hung around the store for a coupla years and I got it on the cheap cause the store manager wanted to see the last of it.
If the rumor of the demise of the BLR 450 Marlin is true then the caliber is on its last flicker before obsolescence.
Hornady/Marlin doomed the caliber to extinction with the proprietary belt.
They would have been better advised to use the 458 x 2" or the 458 Short or 458 American as the host cartridge for the then on the drawing board Marlin 1895M.
458 Short/American cases can be made by shortening 458 Winchester Magnum cases because of the proprietary wide belt.
450 Marlin brass cannot be made from any other case.
I can't imagine Hornady continuing to manufacture the 450 Marlin ammo for much longer and no other company makes it.
I stockpiled 800 factory rounds of 450 Marlin ammo & won't run out in this lifetime.
The 450 Marlin is a smoother cycling action than the 45-70 because it is rimless.
That BLR 450 Marlin is without a doubt a levergunners dream come true in regards to action cycling smoothness.
Too bad the 450 Marlin will soon be RIP.
If you have a 450 Marlin firearm & plan on keeping it I'd advise stockpiling some factory ammo while it is still made.